U.S. News
Senator Claims New US-EU Deal Is “Fake”
Clear Facts
- Senator criticized the recent U.S.-EU trade agreement, calling it “fake” and “illusory” on the Senate floor.
- The trade deal includes EU commitments of $750 billion in U.S. energy purchases and $600 billion of investment by 2028.
- Claims of a $90 billion tax hike from the deal have not been supported by economists or nonpartisan analysts.
Senator Chuck Schumer took to the Senate floor expressing anger over the newly announced United States-European Union trade agreement. He called the deal a “fake,” insisting the benefits for American families are being exaggerated and lack genuine commitment from the European side.
Schumer claimed, “It will result in a $90 billion per year tax hike on American families… When you raise tariffs, the American families pay for it… a $90 billion tax on American families in this tariff deal with the European Union.”
However, independent analysis and economic experts have indicated that this number is a significant stretch. No nonpartisan agency has supported this figure, and the projected impact on American families is reportedly far smaller than Schumer asserts.
According to policy observers, Schumer’s inflated figure appears geared more toward scoring political points rather than reflecting grounded economic reality. Still, he pointed to skepticism expressed by business media to paint the agreement as less than what was promised.
He went on, “Trump would have you believe it’s the biggest deal ever.” Schumer added, “Europe has admitted that this agreement isn’t legally binding, and they have no control over whether these investments even happen.”
He then further criticized, “Donald Trump is, as usual, trying to hype up, exaggerate, and lie about his accomplishments! Donald Trump always lies, almost always lies, about his accomplishments.”
Schumer compared the U.S.-EU deal to previous international arrangements, including a deal with Japan, dismissing this agreement as “fake! He just fakes it! Makes it up!”
[EMBED TWEET: https://twitter.com/ResisttheMS/status/1949969230817878238]
Over the weekend, President Trump declared the United States had reached a major deal with the European Union after discussions with the European Commission president. As outlined, the agreement secures a 15% blanket tariff on most EU goods entering the U.S. (half of the rate the U.S. previously considered implementing) and commits Europe to purchase $750 billion worth of American energy resources—including oil, liquefied natural gas, and nuclear fuel—across the next three years.
Additionally, the EU has pledged $600 billion in investments within the U.S. economy by 2028, creating opportunities for increased American production, job creation, and domestic growth. The deal’s legal enforceability remains a point of contention among critics, though these types of international agreements often involve framework commitments as a first step.
Conservatives argue that Schumer’s attempt to downplay or outright distort the scope and impact of the trade deal illustrates a pattern where political interests outweigh honest discussion of policy.
American patriots have long watched claims from Washington that miss the real opportunities for jobs, manufacturing, and energy independence at home. This latest effort to minimize a substantial trade win is seen by many as another example of the political class putting rhetoric above reality, especially when President Trump’s policies are involved.
Laurie Boviall
July 30, 2025 at 5:15 pm
Chuckie – please stop talking.
Chris Hill
July 30, 2025 at 5:23 pm
If Chuckles is against so ething, it mrans that it must be good for the U.S.A.
Maxx
July 30, 2025 at 7:35 pm
Now Schummer is an expert on trade deals and their impact on the economy. Six months ago he claims he is an expert on inflation. In both cases was he was terribly wrong. For a guy who went to Harvard his degree was in Social Studies. By 24 he was involved in politics. Therefore despite his Law degree he never actually held a non-governmental job, just like Bernie Sanders. Two very famous parasites living off the American taxpayers in jobs where actual performance is totally optional. That is what needs to be changed about politics. In order to run for an office there needs to be a requirement that you have actually made a living working at a non-government job first. No positive private sector experience no government employment !!!
Gregor Brewski
July 30, 2025 at 9:32 pm
Whenever Shumer opens his mouth, lies emerge. He’s a pathetic democRat.
Patrick FS Fessel
July 31, 2025 at 5:52 am
Why is it all of the sudden the Democrats are opposed to taxing the rich uncaring profit oriented coporations. That’s what a tariff taxes. A tariff can cause price increase-but that a cost of goods, whereas inflation is the devaluation of the dollar which is purely a result of flooding the zone with more dollars backed by nothing more than debt-hence a self-cleaning oven. At some point-Democrats and a had full of Republican law makers need to be replaced and the husstle has to be replaced with elemantary math.
D. Elwood
July 31, 2025 at 6:05 am
Typical democrat reasoning: It’s so, because I said it’s so!