SPLC Accused of Direct Election Interference and Insurrection in 2020

Clear Facts

• Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow accused the Southern Poverty Law Center of engaging in election interference during the 2020 election cycle
• Marlow characterized the SPLC’s actions as creating hoaxes used by Democratic Party candidates
• The allegations suggest the organization was empowered by the Democrat Party to influence electoral outcomes

In a powerful segment on “The Alex Marlow Show,” the Breitbart Editor-in-Chief leveled serious accusations against the Southern Poverty Law Center, claiming the organization actively interfered in the 2020 presidential election. Marlow’s comments have reignited debates about the role of activist organizations in American electoral politics.

“This was election interference,” Marlow stated during Friday’s broadcast.

“This is people who were empowered by the Democrat Party who are creating hoaxes that the Democrat candidates” could leverage, he continued.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has long positioned itself as a civil rights watchdog, but conservatives have increasingly questioned the organization’s credibility and motives. Critics argue that the SPLC has strayed far from its original mission and now operates primarily as a left-wing political advocacy group that targets conservative organizations and individuals.

Marlow’s use of the term “insurrection” is particularly notable given the Democrats’ repeated use of that word to describe the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot. By applying the same terminology to the SPLC’s alleged activities in 2020, Marlow is drawing a direct comparison between physical disruption of government proceedings and what he characterizes as institutional manipulation of the electoral process.

The accusations come at a time when many Americans are expressing concerns about the integrity of election processes and the influence of well-funded organizations on political outcomes. Questions about the role of non-governmental organizations in shaping public perception during election cycles have become increasingly central to conservative critiques of the current political landscape.

The SPLC has faced growing scrutiny in recent years, including internal scandals involving workplace culture and accusations of racial discrimination within the organization itself. These controversies have undermined the group’s moral authority even as it continues to label mainstream conservative organizations as “hate groups.”

Marlow’s comments suggest a broader pattern of coordinated activity between progressive activist organizations and Democratic Party political operations. This alleged coordination raises fundamental questions about transparency, accountability, and the potential for abuse when advocacy groups wield significant influence over public discourse during critical election periods.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.