U.S. News
A Judge’s Explosive Dissent Could Boost Trump’s Supreme Court Shortlist
Clear Facts
- Ninth Circuit upheld Washington forcing women-only spa to allow naked biological males around girls as young as thirteen.
- Judge Lawrence Van Dyke issued fiery dissent calling case about “swinging d***s” invading traditional nude spa.
- His unapologetic stand positions him atop Trump’s SCOTUS list if Alito retires this summer.
Samuel Alito might step down soon, elevating Judge Van Dyke due to his straightforward rebuke of leftist judicial madness.
The Olympus Spa case involves Christian owners protecting female clients from perverts in a private women-only space.
“This is a case about swinging d***s. The Christian owners of Olympus Spa—a traditional Korean, women-only, nude spa—understandably don’t want them in their spa. Their female employees and female clients don’t want them in their spa either. But Washington State insists on them. And now so does the Ninth Circuit.”
Judge Van Dyke refuses euphemisms, exposing how woke rulings prioritize deviants over women’s safety and dignity.
Normal Americans must tolerate this degeneracy, but fighters like Van Dyke call it out plainly to protect traditional values.
Conservatives demand justices who defend common sense against insane social experiments harming young girls.
Trump should nominate proven warriors to reclaim the Supreme Court from pervert-enablers.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
