NFL Urges Supreme Court to Shield State Gambling Laws From Kalshi

Clear Facts

• The NFL filed an amicus brief supporting New Jersey regulators, calling Kalshi a disguised sportsbook.
• The league claims prediction markets on sports outcomes should fall under state gambling authority.
• The brief argues Kalshi uses federal exchange rules to bypass state-level oversight.

The National Football League has stepped into a legal fight over sports betting by asking the Supreme Court to uphold state power to regulate prediction markets.

The league’s amicus brief supports New Jersey regulators who are challenging Kalshi’s contracts tied to sports results.

According to the filing, these contracts function like traditional sports wagers despite operating under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

“Sports prediction contracts should be subject to state gambling laws,” the NFL brief states.

The league contends that allowing federally regulated platforms to handle sports wagers undermines the authority states gained after the 2018 Supreme Court decision that ended the federal sports betting ban.

New Jersey officials have argued that Kalshi’s offerings violate state law by offering direct bets on professional sports contests.

The NFL maintains that preserving state oversight protects fans and maintains the integrity of the games.

“The NFL urged the Supreme Court to protect states’ authority to regulate sports gambling Thursday,” the original report noted.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.