U.S. News
Supreme Court Vacancy Sparks Urgent Hunt for True Originalists
Clear Facts
- Justice Scalia warned judge nominations became eminently political results-oriented process
- Replacing Alito or Thomas risks shifting Court from originalism
- Sauer and Bailey show proven textualist restraint records
Politicized federal judge selections intensified recently. Supreme Court vacancy threatens constitutionalist balance.
President Trump requires nominees with rigorous text-based philosophy. Courageous originalists like Thomas and Alito essential.
John Sauer serves as U.S. Solicitor General. He clerked for Justice Scalia.
Sauer stated principles of federalism and judicial restraint urge the Supreme Court to exercise caution when considering the expansion of constitutional rights in areas of contentious social dispute.
Sauer challenges nationwide injunctions. He criticizes administrative state expansion.
Andrew Bailey boasts military service and prosecution experience.
Bailey self-describes as textualist. Judges need to be very deferential to the policy branches of government.
Judges are not allowed to make law.
Individual liberties and the rule of law are timeless principles that form the bedrock of our constitutional republic.
The Constitution exists to protect us from the government. It’s the role of government to protect our rights.
Trump must select based on data and principle. Sauer and Bailey uphold Supreme Court’s constitutional role against legislating from bench.
Nominate proven originalists to preserve America’s founding principles. Demand justices faithful to text and restraint.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
