North Carolina Father Takes School Board to Court Over Bathroom Safety Disclosure

Clear Facts

• A North Carolina father filed suit against the Cabarrus County school board after officials refused to disclose whether opposite-sex students use his children’s bathrooms and locker rooms
• The lawsuit centers on the school board’s refusal to provide transparency about facility usage policies that directly affect student privacy and safety
• The case highlights growing parental concerns over school policies that may prioritize gender identity accommodations over traditional privacy protections

A father in Cabarrus County, North Carolina, has filed a lawsuit against his local school board after administrators refused to answer a straightforward question: Are members of the opposite biological sex using the same bathrooms and locker rooms as his children?

The lawsuit marks the latest flashpoint in an ongoing national debate over parental rights, student safety, and the limits of school authority. At its core, the case asks whether schools have the right to withhold basic information from parents about who their children may encounter in intimate facilities.

Brandon Matthews, a North Carolina father, is taking his children’s school district to court after officials allegedly declined to answer whether biological males can access the bathrooms used by his daughter.

His lawsuit seeks information about the district’s policies and… pic.twitter.com/PZkm6KAf7D

— One America News (@OANN) August 9, 2026

According to the complaint, the father made multiple requests to school officials seeking clarification about bathroom and locker room policies at his children’s schools. Each time, administrators declined to provide the information, citing student privacy concerns and district policy.

The refusal to disclose this information has raised serious questions among parents about transparency and accountability in public education. Many argue that parents have a fundamental right to know about policies that directly affect their children’s privacy and sense of security in school facilities.

Critics of the school board’s position contend that protecting the privacy of biological males who identify as female should not come at the expense of informing parents about facility usage that affects their daughters. They argue that such policies represent a dramatic shift in school operations that parents should be notified about and have the opportunity to address.

The lawsuit comes amid a broader national conversation about the balance between accommodating students who identify as transgender and protecting the privacy rights and safety concerns of the majority of students who use facilities based on biological sex.

Conservative parents and advocacy groups have increasingly challenged school policies they view as prioritizing progressive gender ideology over common-sense privacy protections. Many argue that allowing biological males into female facilities creates unnecessary risks and violates the reasonable expectations of privacy that have governed public accommodations for generations.

The Cabarrus County case could have implications far beyond North Carolina, potentially setting precedent for how schools across the country handle parental requests for information about facility usage policies. Legal experts note that the outcome may hinge on whether courts view such information as protected student privacy data or as policy information that parents have a right to access.

Supporters of the father’s lawsuit argue that transparency is a cornerstone of accountable public education. They maintain that schools serve families and communities, not the other way around, and that parents deserve honest answers to reasonable questions about their children’s school environment.

The school board has not publicly commented on the specifics of the lawsuit. However, school officials in similar disputes across the country have often cited federal guidance and anti-discrimination policies as justification for accommodating transgender students’ facility preferences while limiting information shared with other parents.

As the case moves forward, it will likely draw attention from advocacy groups on both sides of the issue. Parental rights organizations are watching closely, viewing it as a test case for whether schools can operate with what they consider unacceptable secrecy about policies affecting children’s safety and privacy.

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.