U.S. News
Court Ruling Shifts California Tariff Case Venue

"Rob Bonta at Central Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility opening, December 2018" by Pi.1415926535 is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 .
Clear Facts
- A U.S. District Court judge dismissed California’s lawsuit against Trump’s tariffs, ruling it should be heard in the U.S. Court of International Trade.
- The Trump administration partially succeeded in its request to transfer the case from California to the CIT.
- California Attorney General Rob Bonta expressed satisfaction that the dismissal allows for an appeal to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a significant legal development, a U.S. District Court judge ruled against California’s attempt to challenge President Donald Trump’s tariffs in a local court. The judge’s decision was based on jurisdiction, stating that the case should be heard in the New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) instead.
This ruling represents a partial victory for the Trump administration, which had argued for the case to be moved to the CIT rather than being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The decision by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley to dismiss the lawsuit now allows California the opportunity to appeal to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, known for its liberal leanings.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta responded to the court’s decision by saying, “strongly believe this case belongs in federal district court and are pleased the court considered our wishes in dismissing this case so we have the opportunity to seek review.” This statement highlights California’s determination to continue its legal battle against the tariffs.
The lawsuit, originally filed in April by Bonta and Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom, argued that Trump’s tariffs would cause direct harm to California’s economy. It also claimed that the president’s use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) to implement the tariffs was unconstitutional.
Despite the court’s ruling, the offices of the White House, Governor Newsom, and Attorney General Bonta did not provide immediate comments on the decision.
Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.
Evelynn Beverly
June 4, 2025 at 2:12 pm
After hearing others discuss how much money they could make online, I made the decision to do some research. It was all true, and it has changed my life in every way..
Go On Profile
Steven Cushman
June 4, 2025 at 7:56 pm
Besides filling in the wrong venue CA doesn’t have standing because any harm to the state is indirect. The companies that pay the tariff have standing.