Connect with us

U.S. News

Judge rejects Trump’s offer to provide DNA in Carroll rape defamation case

Published

on

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:


  • A federal judge rejected an offer by former President Trump to provide a DNA sample in E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuit.
  • Judge Lewis Kaplan said Trump’s offer came too late.
  • Carroll accused Trump of raping her in a Manhattan store in the 1990s.

A federal judge in New York rejected a conditional offer by former President Donald Trump to provide a DNA sample in E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuit. The writer accused Trump of raping her in a dressing room at a Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in the 1990s.

Judge Lewis Kaplan said Wednesday that Trump’s offer was too late, coming after the end of the process for exchanging evidence in a lawsuit.

Trump is also accused of having defamed Carroll when he denied her claim. Carroll, 79, is a former Elle magazine columnist.

The judge also said that the former president had no justification for making his offer on the condition that Carroll’s attorneys be ordered to turn over a missing appendix to a report on male DNA found on the dress she has said she was wearing during the “sexual assault”.

Trump vehemently denies raping Carroll, who wanted to test his DNA against samples from the dress she said she wore that day.

Kaplan’s decision means DNA evidence will not be presented at all in the trial.

Joseph Tacopina, Trump’s attorney in the case, declined to comment on the ruling.

Trump had refused to provide a DNA sample until recently.

Advertisement

Kaplan’s order Wednesday speculated that Trump’s “patently untimely request for the appendix reflects either tactical shift or just an afterthought.”

One possible explanation is that Trump’s legal team originally decided not to demand for the appendix over the past three years because of concerns that Carroll’s lawyers would have “renewed demands for Mr. Trump’s DNA.” Another possible explanation, Kaplan wrote, is that Trump’s lawyers had “a negligent failure to read the report with any care over the entire three-year period and thus the failure to notice the lack of the appendix.”

“But whatever the explanation, the effort comes too late,” the judge wrote.

The judge also noted that the process of exchanging evidence, known as discovery, is completed. Therefore, Carroll would not be entitled now to get a DNA sample from Trump.

“Her counsel have had plenty of opportunities in both of the two related cases to move to compel Mr. Trump to submit a DNA sample,” Kaplan wrote. “Had they done so, they almost certainly would have gotten it. But Ms. Carroll’s counsel never moved to compel Mr. Trump to submit a DNA sample. They obviously decided to go to trial without it.”

The trial in the case is set to begin on April 25.

Source: The Hill

Advertisement
7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. Vic

    February 16, 2023 at 8:31 am

    Her attornies didn’t seek to compel Trump to PROVIDE DNA to compare to her dress DNA, but when he offers to, they don’t want it. And now will not bring dress DNA to the trial and REFUSE to hand over the Appendix record IDENTIFYING the DNA?. Did they already have a match to some non-billionaire’s DNA? Yes, they wouldn’t want that, so didn’t compel Trump for DNA and WON’T bring dress DNA to hearing.

    Another Obama or Biden judge?

    • giovanna

      February 18, 2023 at 8:58 pm

      my thoughts are the same. go figure, interesting thy do not want the dna

      • Mark

        February 19, 2023 at 6:51 pm

        1) this is a DNC manipulated 25-30 year old case
        2) being decades old smells of corruption
        3) alleged victim is a former has been writer & out for money
        4) such timing ! Horse manure.

  2. giovanna

    February 18, 2023 at 9:01 pm

    I agree with you, thousands of cases have been solved with DNA, but they don’t want the DNA. Another fake accusation

  3. RP

    February 19, 2023 at 6:53 am

    This judge just shot down any credibility the lawsuit could ever have. The amount of time that had transpired from the attack, makes no difference. A Virginia man was executed for killing a female years ago. He kept denying his involvement, despite having the victim’s blood on his clothes. A DNA test was done of the clothes, even with 20 years of time passed from the time of the incident. It proved that the correct person had been arrested and was about to be see executed. A stay of execution was not granted.

    • Mark

      February 19, 2023 at 6:54 pm

      And the murderer got killed. Justice dispensed.

  4. Ron C

    February 19, 2023 at 7:21 pm

    This smells like a old ugly lady’s fantasy to me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *