Connect with us

U.S. News

What to Know About the Judge Assigned to Trump’s Jan. 6 Case

Published

on

Clear Facts:

  • U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, known for her stern sentencing, has been assigned to the election fraud case against former President Donald Trump.
  • Chutkan has previously ruled against Trump in a separate case related to the January 6th incident and has sentenced at least 38 individuals involved in the Capitol event to prison terms.
  • The judge has maintained that prison can serve as a strong deterrent against similar events in the future and has argued against comparing the Capitol event to peaceful civil rights protests.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, now assigned to oversee the election fraud case against former President Donald Trump, is known for her strict stance on those involved in the U.S. Capitol event on January 6th.

This pivotal event was a response to concerns raised by Trump and his supporters regarding the legitimacy of the 2020 election results.

Judge Chutkan, previously an assistant public defender, was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama.

Her role now includes scrutinizing the allegations directed at Trump for purportedly attempting to challenge his election loss, leading up to the critical events at the Capitol.

Known for her rigorous approach, Judge Chutkan has often assigned prison sentences to those involved in the January 6th event that are sterner than those suggested by Justice Department prosecutors.

In a separate case related to the same incident, she has ruled against Trump.

In November 2021, she dismissed Trump’s bid to prevent the release of certain documents to the House’s January 6th committee, arguing that executive privilege could not be claimed indefinitely.

In a striking comment from her ruling, Chutkan stated, “Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.”

According to an Associated Press analysis of court records, Judge Chutkan has sentenced at least 38 people connected with the Capitol event to prison terms, with durations spanning from 10 days to over five years.

She is among the 24 judges in Washington, D.C., who have passed sentences on approximately 600 defendants related to their participation in the January 6th event.

Over one-third of these defendants have managed to avoid prison time.

In 19 out of 38 sentences, Chutkan has either matched or gone beyond the prosecutors’ recommendations.

She has commented that prison sentences can serve as a powerful deterrent against potential similar incidents.

In a 2021 hearing, Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump nominee, expressed concern that the Justice Department was being excessively harsh on those involved in the Capitol event, as compared to those detained during racial injustice protests following the murder of George Floyd in 2020.

Without referring to McFadden by name, Judge Chutkan countered his argument.

In her view, comparing those protesting largely peacefully for civil rights to those engaged in the Capitol event is a false equivalence, overlooking the significant threat she believes the January 6th event posed to the democratic foundation of the nation.

As we move forward, it will be interesting to see how Judge Chutkan’s uncompromising approach to law and order will affect the ongoing case against the former President.


Source

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. The Rebel

    August 4, 2023 at 8:15 am

    Communists are allowed to be federal judges?????

  2. Ron C

    August 4, 2023 at 10:06 am

    She is a ringer, and certainly was not randomly selected!

  3. LMB

    August 4, 2023 at 10:39 am

    Talk about Bigoted judges!!! She’s as Biased as they come!!! 98% of the people involved in the PROTEST were WHITE!!! Now put that to the test of her sentencing! Appointed by Obamie, the closet gay!
    28 U.S. Code § 144 – Bias or prejudice of judge. Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such proceeding.
    Code of Conduct for United States Judges:
    B. Outside Influence. A judge should not allow family, social, political,
    financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment.
    A judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance
    the private interests of the judge or others nor convey or permit others to
    convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the
    judge. A judge should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.

  4. Bill in Webster NY

    August 4, 2023 at 4:22 pm

    Oh, I see, it’s okay for the judge in Florida to be an ACTUAL Trump nominee, but you have a problem with an Obama nominee (who was approved unanimously, 95-0, because she was considered so qualified by both parties). Do you not see the hypocrisy?

  5. EMMA

    October 26, 2023 at 11:47 am

    WE HOPE JUDGE CHUTKIN CAN SLEEP AT NIGHT.EVERYONE OF THE J6 IS LIVING IN HELL THANKS TO THIS WOMEN.FUNNY HOW ILLEGALS AND HAMAS SUPPORTERS ARE ALLOWED TO DEMONSTRATE IN OUR COUNTRY. BUT WE NEVER SEE AMERICAN CITIZENS DEMANDING OR DEMONSTRATING EVER. PLUS DEMOCRATS USE THE MOST VILE LANGUAGE AGAINST THE GOP, BUT THE GOP NEVER USES FOUL LANGUAGE, JUST LISTEN TO MAXINE WATERS ETC.TALK ABOUT A 2 TIER JUSTICE SYSTEM.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

" "