Arbitrary Goals and Mind-Numbing Costs: A Critique of the Climate Change Debate

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW!

• The article criticizes the latest report from the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for highlighting the absurdity of the climate war.
• It points out that the goal of limiting warming to 1.5°C is arbitrary and past plans to achieve it were a joke.
• The article suggests that the costs of global warming do not come anywhere close to the mind-numbing price of trying to halt it, and that the answer is in encouraging innovation.

The latest report from the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has come under criticism in a recent article for being a part of the “climate war.” The article argues that the goal of limiting warming to 1.5°C is arbitrary and past plans to achieve it were a joke.

It also suggests that the costs of global warming do not come anywhere close to the mind-numbing price of trying to halt it, and that the answer is in encouraging innovation.

The article points out that the IPCC’s report states that by 2030, global temperatures “could exceed 1.5°C relative to 1850-1900 with a probability between 40% and 60%.”

However, the author argues that limiting warming to 1.5°C is a key goal of climate warriors, and that it is fundamentally arbitrary. The author also suggests that past plans to achieve this goal were a joke.

The article highlights that while the UN is calling for wealthier nations to shell out three to six times as much as they are now on “climate action” to keep global warming between 1.5°C and 2°C, China and India are not following suit.

In fact, China issued 168 permits for coal-fueled power plants last year, while new construction on such plants soared 50% from the year before.

The author argues that the costs of global warming do not come anywhere close to the mind-numbing price of trying to halt it, and that the answer is in encouraging innovation.

In conclusion, the article suggests that the costs of global warming do not come anywhere close to the mind-numbing price of trying to halt it, and that the answer is in encouraging innovation.

The author argues that the goal of limiting warming to 1.5°C is arbitrary, and that past plans to achieve it were a joke. The article also points out that China and India are not following suit in the fight against global warming.

Source: nypost.com